Posted on Leave a comment

Faolanus Crinklii Monograph

Field Monograph: Faolanus crinklii

Compiled by Dr. S.L. Pickerel
Department of Domestic Fauna Studies
Ohio Institute of Paranormal Ecology

๐Ÿ“˜ Taxonomic Classification

Described: Pickerel, 2025

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Lagomintia (provisional)
Family: Menthosauridae
Genus: Faolanus
Species: crinklii
Common Name: Wintergreen Bandit

1. ๐Ÿ“ Morphology & Identification

No confirmed visual documentation exists of F. crinklii itself. All identification is based on indirect signs, primarily wrapper spoorโ€”small cellophane rectangles (~4cm x 2cm), typically crinkled, discarded in clusters or linear trails.

Figure 1. Wrapper Spoor Pattern
Crinkled transparent rectangles deposited without nesting, often appearing in toe-print or arc formations. Believed to be a communication or navigation mechanism.

2. ๐ŸŒ Habitat & Range

Core Habitat:
Northwest Ohio (approx. 41.5ยฐN, 83.7ยฐW)

Confirmed Range:
Up to 100 miles from the core zone, with sightings in surrounding counties and residential interiors.

Map 1: Estimated Distribution of F. crinklii
Dark green = confirmed core habitat
Light green = expanded sightings
Spoor confirmed in both rural and suburban interiors and exteriors

3. ๐Ÿฌ Diet & Feeding Ecology

F. crinklii is an obligate monophagous consumer of Wintergreen Life Savers (Mentha saccharata tabularis). No secondary food sources confirmed.

  • Foraging signs: torn or punctured wrappers
  • Unwrapping rate: ~2 seconds per unit
  • Rejection of non-target baits: 100% (Pickerel et al., 2023)

โ€œThe subject demonstrates a dietary rigidity unseen in most domestic cryptofauna.โ€ โ€“ Journal of Applied Cryptozoology

4. ๐Ÿ“ˆ Behavior & Temporal Activity

  • Nocturnal and elusive
  • Peak activity: 21:00โ€“02:00 EST
  • Observed behaviors:
    • Repeat foraging at empty sites
    • Wrapper scattering in known corridors (e.g., kitchen โ†’ couch โ†’ glovebox)
    • Zero audio trace
    • Post-foraging denialism in suspected hosts

โ€œSpoor appears freshly deposited within minutes, often under conditions of complete silence. Witnesses remain unaware until a sudden and inexplicable shortage of wintergreen is observed.โ€ โ€“ Pickerel, 2024

5. ๐Ÿ” Field Identification Protocol

To confirm F. crinklii presence:

  • Survey wrapper sites daily.
  • Photograph spoor with macro lens and oblique light.
  • Map crinkle pattern density.
  • Count remaining mints before and after periods of absence.

Do not attempt confrontation.
Subjects exhibit advanced deflection and may trigger localized cognitive dissonance (“The Grandson Defense”).

6. ๐Ÿ“š Reference Notes

  • Pickerel, S.L. (2021). Unwrapping the Unknown: Faunal Markers of Midwestern Mintivores
  • Pickerel, S.L. & Collins, P. (2023). Cryptofaunal Mintivory: Ecological Monotony in the Domestic Sphere
  • Pickerel, S.L. (2024). Transdimensional Infiltration via Affection Anchors: The Grandma Effect

๐Ÿ” Conservation Status

Abundant.
Not subject to legal protection.
Local lore discourages eradication. Management strategies limited to rationing.

Appendix A: Visual Evidence of Existence of Faolanus crinklii

Collected and catalogued by P. Collins, 2025
All images unaltered. Locations and timestamps verified.


Figure A1.

Wrapper spoor trail, north/south alignment pattern.
Location: Eastern exterior of small farmhouse, Champaign County, OH (May 2025)


Figure A2.

Close-up of single wrapper (~4cm x 2cm).
Notable features: pressure-folded edge, leftward twist.
Location: Living room, Champaign County, OH (May 2025)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *